Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
AceJohnny2
on April 9, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Amazon Elastic File System
That's enticing, are there any references/benchmarks to back it up?
Titanous
on April 9, 2015
|
next
[–]
The protocol itself is
much
cleaner, but I'm not aware of any recent benchmarks.
Compare
https://ericvh.github.io/9p-rfc/rfc9p2000.html
vs
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5661
kilburn
on April 9, 2015
|
parent
|
next
[–]
TODO: conduct this comparison when 9p specification is not full of "TODOs"...
Titanous
on April 9, 2015
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Oops, missed that. This is more complete:
http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/5/intro
antocv
on April 10, 2015
|
prev
[–]
From my own benchmark, on kernel Linux 3.19.3.201503270049-1-grsec, qemu 2.2.1, 9p was 500% slower on read and immensily - after 9min gave on the write test which took 29s on host.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
