Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> my understanding is that if you're single you can't really opt out of these apps, practically speaking.

This is definitely not true.

> Even the norms around dating, picking people up in bars, etc. are changing because of these apps

This is true.

> so it's harder to find people in the real world.

This is sort of true.

By not using a dating app, a single person is relegating themselves to how things were pre-app. Some of those pre-app options are less common now, other new ways are more common.

The apps widened the dating door for certain people, specifically for people who are not particularly keen on getting out and meeting people (probably quite a few folks like that on HN) as well as people who are looking to get married asap[1]. That said, for people who get out and do things, meeting people to date is not difficult at all. Getting banned from Tinder for those folks is, at worst, a loss of a time filler activity (swiping).

I will also add that, of the apps, tinder might be one of the worst in terms of quality match ups.

[1] Apps are also good for highly desirable dates since their pool goes from big to biggest, but those folks aren’t really the topic here since they aren’t short on access to dates with or without an app.



Dating exclusively by apps might be reality for the younger US populations.

There was a thread on Reddit a few months ago where people were asking bad places for men to approach women. It was basically

Work

School

Gym

Church

Any place you go for hobby

Public transport

Shops

Bars

Anywhere outside at night

Parks

The consensus was basically the women on this Reddit thread don't want men approaching them in any way whatsoever that isnt a dating app. All alternative s were creepy. Now Reddit is mostly young and American, so who knows.

Dating in the US seems crazy.


After checking reality, online dating's the #1 way people meet, and its market share (>50%) is growing. [0] [1]

[0] https://news.stanford.edu/2019/08/21/online-dating-popular-w...

[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/06/10-facts-ab...


Sure. It widened the options for most people. Excellent!

That said, as the post I originally responded to suggested, I don’t think that getting banned from Tinder or any dating app in particular is a “big deal”. Maybe a minor inconvenience for most people, but it’s not like someone who gets banned from Tinder is doomed to a life without dates.


To save someone a click, so there is a study indicating 40% of couples “met online” (so via Twitter, IG, HN, Reddit, gaming, WhatsApp groups, etc., not necessarily dating apps); and then a study specifically about online dating apps where most participants were recruited online (in addition to the usual selection bias) so I didn’t bother checking results. Both are US-centric.


>To save someone a click,

And yet you admit

>I didn’t bother checking results. Both are US-centric.

...

You need to let the Stanford Professor and Pew Research know they're unqualified to perform research. :S


To reiterate, the first paper does not specifically pertain to dating apps, and the methodology of the second article is flawed (you want to know whether people meet online, so you ask people of whom >50% you found online, great technique)—so it might save someone who cares about that kind of stuff a click (a few clicks actually, since the methodology is buried in a separate article). If you don’t fall into that category, feel free to move along.

And I don’t know the author of the second article personally, but if I did of course I would point out an issue with their data.


You're being difficult on purpose.

> methodology is buried in a separate article

It's an EXPLICIT footnote! See "Note; Here [is the report's] metholodgy."

> Methodology of the second article is flawed (you want to know whether people meet online, so you ask people online, great technique)

The methodology goes into statistical techniques to control for biases (e.g. language, gender identity, sampling method, etc.) See Methodology > Weighting about what they did with their ~5k responses.


1st click to go to the article, ctrl+f to find methodology, 2nd click to go to methodology. See 6000+ people recruited via web. The rest seem to amount to fewer than that. Am I the one being difficult?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: